Elevator Pitch: EXPLIoT Academy
Want to fast-track your career in IoT security? At EXPLIoT Academy, you don’t just learn from experts you learn from the very researchers who have presented their work at top cybersecurity conferences like Black Hat, DEF CON, and Nullcon. In fact, the same course material you’ll study has been featured on these global stages. Our hands-on, real-world training ensures you’re among the top 1% in the field. Forget theoretical learnings and gain practical skills that set you apart. Start now at academy.expliot.io.
​
ICP 1: Independent Cybersecurity Professional ( Researchers & Consultant )
ICP 2: Enterprise IoT Security & Compliance Teams
ICP 3: IoT Security Students ( University level learners & Early Professionals)
Method Used for defining personas
1. Analysis of all paid customer profiles
2. Analysis of visitors; company data sourced from ZoomInfo
3. Analysis of visitors - who sign up for free course.
Criteria | ICP 1: Independent Cybersecurity Professional | ICP 2: Enterprise IoT Security & Compliance Teams | IoT Security Students ( University Level Learners & Early Professionals ) |
---|---|---|---|
20-40 Year Old | ​30-50 Year Old | 18-28 Year old | |
Region: Primary - US, UK, Germany ; Secondary - India | Region: Primary - US, UK , Germany ; Secondary - India | Region: Primary - US, UK , Germany ; Secondary - India | |
Small security consulting firms, IoT security, Bug Bounties | Industries - Automative, industrial IoT, Manufacturing, Smart Devices. | Industries - Cybersecurity, Embedded Systems, IoT Development | |
Pen-testers, Red Teamers, Bug Bounty Hunters, IoT Security Consultants. | Security Professional working in large enterprises & industrial IoT companies. | University students & fresh graduates in cybersecurity, IoT, and embedded systems | |
Security professionals who need advanced IoT hacking skills for client work & bug bounty programs | Teams responsible for IoT Security assessments, compliance, and vulnerability management. | Early-career professional transitioning into IoT Security | |
IoT security is a niche, high-paying field - learning these skills increase their earning potential. | Their companies design, manufacture, or deploy IoT devices, which are high-risk targets for cyber threats. | Practical IoT security training missing in university courses. | |
More companies demand IoT pentests, and they want to expand their consulting services. | Regulatory compliance (ISO 21434, NIST 800-183, EU, Cyber Resilience Act) requires their team to have IoT security expertise. | Hands-on experience helps them get internships or entry-level jobs. | |
Bug bounty programs are offering rewards for IoT vulher abilities —> learning these skills is financially valuable. | They need structured corporate training for their security engineers & analyst | Prepare them for future certification & professional growth. | |
​IoT Security training is hard to find —> most available courses are not hands-on | Compliance risk - struggle to meet IoT security compliance standards. | Theoretical university courses don’t provide hands-on hacking practice. | |
Lack of structured labs and real-world scenarios —-> needs interactive practice with real IoT vulnerabilities | Lack of in-house IoT security training - most security teams are general cybersecurity experts, not IoT-specific. | Lack of affordable IoT security courses for students. | |
Stiff competition in bug bounties & consulting —> need advanced skills to stand out | High cost of third-party security assessment - need to upskill internal teams to reduce dependency on external vendors. | Tough job market –> needs extra certification to stand out. | |
Learns via practical, hands -on training ( HTB, TryHackMe, CTF challenges ) | Learns via structured, corporate training programs | Consume free content first (youtube, free course) before buying paid content | |
Engages in online security communities ( Reddit IoT Security, Discord, Twitter/X) | Engages in IoT security conferences ( DEFCON, IoT Villages, Nullcon, Hardware.io) | Prefer structured certifications to add to resumes | |
Prefer self-paced, in-dept courses | Trends to follow compliance related cybersecurity content (LinkedIn, Industry Report) | Follow security professionals on Twitter/LinkedIn/youtube | |
Decision makers - The individual learns | Decision Makers: CISO, Security Manger, Compliance Officer. | Decision maker - The Student or University | |
Decision blockers - High Pricing | Decision Blocker: Budget constraints, internal approval processes for training. | Decision Blocker - High pricing or lack of university endorsement | |
Multiple courses per year ( Basis ups killing requirement ) | Quarterly or Annual Team Training Cycles. | Low cost courses at the start, then upgrade to advanced training over time. | |
Hands-on labs used frequently for real-world hacking practices. | New team members need onboarding in IoT security training. | Uses training material for internships & job application. |
Criteria | Adoption Rate | ​ Appetite to Pay | Frequency of Use Case ​ | ​ Distribution Potential | TAM ( users/currency) ​ | Priority Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICP 1 - Independent Cybersecurity Professional | High | Medium | Medium - High | Medium | 1000 user | 2 |
ICP 2 - Enterprise IoT Security & Compliance Team | Moderate | High | Medium - High | High | 1400 users | 1 |
ICP 3 - IoT Security Students (University Level Learner’s &. Early Professionals) | Low | Low | High | Moderate | 1100 users | 3 |
Priority Ranking:
1. Enterprise IoT Security & Compliance Teams —> High distribution potential, high frequency of use, and significant TAM.
2. Independent Cybersecurity Professional —-> High adoption rate and willingness to pay but medium frequency of use and distribution potential.
3. IoT Security Students —-> High frequency of use but low adoption rate and low willingness to pay, making it the lowest priority.
EXPLIoT Academy Core Value Proposition
EXPLIoT Academy's users experience core value proposition when they start the course and work on the First hands-on lab
However apart from the hands-on lab, users also experience value from ;
(Let's begin by doing a basic competitor analysis)
Factors | Competitor 1 : Attify | Competitor 2 : Hack The Box | Competitor 3 | Competitor 4 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
What is the core problem being solved by them? | Advanced IoT exploitation techniques and vulnerability discovery. | |||||||||
What are the products/features/services being offered? | protocol hacking | |||||||||
IoT exploitation kits, | ||||||||||
firmware analysis, | ||||||||||
Who are the users? | ||||||||||
Security researcher | ||||||||||
Ethical hacker | ||||||||||
GTM Strategy | Customizable private training (online) organization | |||||||||
What channels do they use? | Online store / slack community support | |||||||||
What pricing model do they operate on? | Premium pricing for advanced hands on training kits and courses | |||||||||
How have they raised funding? | No | |||||||||
Brand Positioning | unclear / | |||||||||
UX Evaluation | ||||||||||
What is your product’s Right to Win? | ||||||||||
What can you learn from them? |
(Then let's try to understand the market at a macro level and evaluate the trends and tailwinds/headwinds.)
Now it’s time for some math, calculate the size of your market.
TAM = Total no. of potential customers x Average Revenue Per Customer (ARPU)
SAM = TAM x Target Market Segment (percentage of the total market)
SOM = SAM x Market Penetration/Share
The TAM represents the total revenue opportunity available if EXPLIoT Academy were to achieve 100% market share in the IoT security training sector.
Global Cybersecurity Workforce: In 2024, the global cybersecurity workforce is estimated to be approximately 5.46 million professionals.
Average Training Expenditure per Professional: Assuming each cybersecurity professional allocates an average of $1,000 annually for training and professional development.
TAM: $5.46 billion
SAM: $1.092 billion
SOM: $5.46 million
​
Channel Name | Cost | Flexibility | Effort | Speed | Scale |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Top 1: Conference Partnership | Low-medium | Medium | Medium | Medium | Medium-High |
Top 2: Organic - Founders Brand | Low-medium | Medium | Low | Low -Medium | Low - Medium |
Top3: Paid Ads - Google Ads | High | High | High | Fast | Medium |
Top 4: Referral | ​Low | High | Medium | Slow | High |
(Understand, where does organic intent for your product begins?)
​
Step 1 → Identify complementary products used by your ICP
In EPXLIoT Academy‘s case ; ICPs spend time in various activities/exploring different tools such as , attending conferences, sending time in communities, using different tools etc.
Step 2 → Use the selection framework
Integration Partner : Channels | Time to go live | Tech Effort | New users we can get (monthly) | New Users we can get in Month 1 | New Users we can get in Month 2 | New Users we can get in Month 3 |
Conference Partnership | 1 Month | Low | 10-12 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Community Integration | 1-3 Months | Low | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
LMS Course Signups | 1-3 Month | Medium | 5 | 5 | 5 | ​5 |
Step 3 → Collaborate with necessary stakeholders
Step 4 → Map the customer journey
Step 3 → Design the wireframe with the new integration
Step 3 → Run pilot tests before launching
Step 3 → Measure post-integration metrics
​
(For B2B companies, if referral does not make sense you'll take a crack at a partner program for your product)
​
Step 1 → Flesh out the referral/partner program
#1 - Customer Touchpoint
#2 - Platform Currency
#3 - Determine who to ask for a referral
#4 - Referral Partner Discovery
#5 - Referral sharing & Communication
#6 - Tracking referral
#7 - Design the referral landing page for non-users
#8. Encourage continuous referrals
Step 2 → Draw raw frames on a piece of paper to get the gist.​
(Don't spend a lot of time on design. This is for you to communicate how the referral hook will look)​
​we hope this helped you break the cold start problem!
Reminder: This is not the only format to follow, feel free to edit it as you wish!
(Keep it simple and get the basics right)
​
Step 1 → Nail down your content creator, content distributor and your channel of distribution
Step 2 → Decide which type of loop you want to build out.
Step 3 → Create a simple flow diagram to represent the content loop.
Content Loop
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth — from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patience—you’re about to be impressed.